Any thoughts or recommendations? But if your goal is to shoot mostly songbirds, perching birds, and other small species, migrators, etc, you're going to need 500mm-equivalent or more even in the tropics. I will really appreciate any recommendation. I want to upgrade the camera to the Canon M50 but I don't know if I should keep the 55-250mm and adapt it to the M50 or get the 55-200 instead? A lighter, but less flexible option is to take a 300mm lens and a tele-converter or multiplier. For most wildlife, other than birds, a 200mm lens is long enough to get good results. It can be done, which is not the same as saying you can get a lot of them. A second hand D7100 or similar is pretty affordable. Sony FE 600mm f/4 GM OSS Lens. Weatherization to keep light rain and dust out of my lens is always handy in the outdoors. For most wildlife, other than birds, a 200mm lens is long enough to get good results. Most people will feel that 200mm is a little shot for wildlife, but with practice and development of your stalking skills, especially when paired with … It’s an excellent lens for close-up, low light travel, and wildlife photography. I suggest you look at used lenses such as: Canon 100-400 L (the first version should be reasonable used). Is 200mm lens enough for wildlife? Your email address will not be published. Bought a 75-300, better but still not enough. The dilemma of having more equipment that you need or want to carry on any one safari is perhaps one that applies only to those DSLR users with a selection of lenses and accessories. That's what this question is all about. Reason # 5 – The 70-200mm makes a great part-time wildlife lens. Any thought on the Tamron 18-400mm for a Tanzania safari? Let’s start with the big reason, optical performance. Crop frame cameras have a smaller sensor. If you insist on 70-200, the IS mk II is the best. I love the focal range but worry that maybe the images won’t be sharp. There aren’t many 55-200mm DSLR lenses out there; in fact the only one comes from Nikon. Canon 100-400L – This is a classic wildlife lens, with excellent quality and a broad zoom range. Reason # 5 – The 70-200mm makes a great part-time wildlife lens. How close can you get to a wild animal? I have a 400mm lens, yes i could potentially get the same shots with a 200mm lens but considering an important part of wildlife photography is not disturbing the wildlife, I prefer the longer lens. Hi, Reddit. The Excellent 300/4. While a Canon 28-135mm lens might be long enough at the 135mm end to fill the frame with a bird a dozen feet away, it just doesn’t have the focal length to zoom in on a deer several hundred feet away. So yes, you could do quite broad birding with a 200mm lens on crop body. These recommendations are based on lenses we’ve reviewed here at Nature TTL, as well as information gleaned from real life experience with the gear. Fujifilm's latest X-S10 is a likeable mirrorless camera with some of the company's best tech packed inside, and it doesn't cost the earth. Second, this lens offers amazing image … Hi Mike, The f/4 version is much lighter, cheaper and optically also very good, but wild animals are often best photographed around dusk and dawn and in otherwise bad light. Yet even in those places, you may see a small perching bird high in a treetop, 30-40 feet away...the bird is a mere 4 inches tall. There is no substitute for getting up close. The 70-200mm lens is a flagship lens for companies like Nikon and Canon; consequently they are very well built and capable of terrific results. Required fields are marked *, Office Hours: +44 (0)1394 460 277 This is a very good review. Our wet season is here! However, most birders will always want a longer focal length. If you were going after some perching bird outside your window, then you could get by with 200mm on a crop body. The 300 is a great lens, the 200 probably is as well, but longer is better for wildlife. This lens goes from 55mm on the short side to 200mm on the long end, which is a full frame equivalent to 82.5mm all the way up to 300mm. Join the OPG community to access a huge library of outdoor photography instructional videos: https://www.outdoorphotographyguide.com/join/. Both the Canon and the Nikon are lightning fast autofocus and sharp enough to cut with. Most of my images have only a few hundred pixels lost on the long side to tighten up composition. I use two lenses (150mm f2.0 and 300mm f4.0) and try to get close enough for full body with the 150/2 and then use the 300/4 on a second camera to get up close detailed images. 7. is 200mm good for wildlife photography or is it to short a focal length. The Ultimate Wildlife Photography Lens. For wildlife photography, the longer your lens, the closer you’ll be to the action. The heat haze you mention is at its worst during the dry season when there is a lot of dust in the air. It is also worth mentioning that you can get some excellent lenses at terrific prices by buying second hand. 7. Wouldn’t it make more sense to go for a lens that does not overlap so much with what you’ve already got? Let’s take a look at some of the best lenses available for wildlife photography. Although the lens on a bridge camera covers a huge focal range, there are inevitably some trade offs to achieve that. Even walking out in a wetland, forest, or swamp area, completely wild birds and animals will often let you get within 20 feet. As per the reviews, this lens is as sharp as a 600mm f/4. Yes and it's hard a 400mm as well. For wildlife photography, lens options do not get better than this one. A 70-200 mm f/2.8 also pairs nicely with a teleconverter. The major factors I want to consider while shopping are whether the lens provides enough reach (focal length) for my shy and often distant subject. Birds are among the most interesting subjects in nature photography, but capturing them in their environment can be tricky. Of course there is an assumption being made here; that you have a variety of equipment to choose from. And, in truth, if you are hoping to photograph birds then you will probably want a longer lens than 300mm. i am planning to get another body and lens. That image quality along with the versatile made-for-wildlife zoom range this lens offers, especially with the built-in 1.4x extender, has launched the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Lens to wildlife shooter fame. Both Tamron & Sigma make very good 150-600mm lenses. In practical terms, you should be able to manage with 3 lenses, maybe just 2. The reach of the 70-200mm is perfect for so many situations, allowing you to focus in on key subject areas, crop out distracting areas or elements in your frame and just get closer to the action. One factor that I am pondering as I plan a September safari to Kenya and Tanzania, however, is dust, which can easily get into zoom lenses as one zooms out and back in repeatedly. Yes it is, if you have good/great field craft. You'd need 600-800mm equivalent reach to fill half of the frame with him. https://digital-photography-school.com/full-frame-sensor-vs-crop-sensor-which-is-right-for-you/, If you want to know which are the best full frame DSLRs currently available this might be useful, http://www.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/cameras/best-full-frame-dslr-8-cameras-from-canon-nikon-and-sony-compared-1133732, and if you just want a list of some of the best DSLR cameras available at the moment – full and crop frame, then this might help, http://www.techradar.com/news/photography-video-capture/cameras/best-dslr-top-cameras-by-price-and-brand-944543. Now I think the only way I can be prepared is to have a second camera body otherwise I’m unlikely to have the right focal length at the right time. There are drawbacks to it as well, and there are certain tradeoffs that the 70-200mm lens (or any zoom lens for that matter) has to make in order to offer that kind of versatility. At the 200mm end, it’s telephoto enough to get in fairly tight on an animal or to create a foreshortened perspective on a landscape. My main concern is that the 200mm wouldn't be enough for bird photography. At the moment the Sigma costs just £100 more than the 18-400mm Tamron. A 55-200mm lens is generally not thought of as an ideal lens for bird photography. My most used wildlife lens is my 150mm f2.0, which I use on a 2x crop factor camera. I have been fortunate enough to see everything from whales to reindeer while taking pictures, and I’ve learned some tips for photographing wildlife with a short telephoto lens along the way. It's a subtle evolution but enough to keep the $2000 Z model competitive. On Tuesday, Sony announced two new 600mm lenses: a 600mm f/4 prime aimed at pro sports and wildlife photographers, and a much more affordable Sony 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 which is certain to appeal to a much broader audience. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens. I know range is important and there's a 70-300mm lens … So the 1 stop loss may cost you on sharpness and shadow detail. I am wondering how important it is to consider weather and dust sealing in considering what lens(es) to bring. As we press on with our full review, we've analyzed just how the Zeiss ZX1 stacks up in front of our standard studio test scene. If your goal is to photograph wildlife like deer, bobcats, or grizzly bears, you’re going to need more reach — a lens with a focal length of 300mm or greater. Any more than that and not only does weight become an issue but you’ll waste too much time faffing about changing lenses or deciding which one to use. well, photography indead is a rabbit hole. https://www.flickr.com/photos/153053144@N04/. This is plenty of reach for most situations. The reach and quality of the 70-200mm lens is also great for wildlife photography, especially when you want to travel light. In fact I take 90% of my photos with this lens. I've been shooting wildlife for 25 years and rarely do I get so close that a 200 mm would suffice. I find that I use the 200-500 almost exclusively for birds. Once again a zoom lens works well. This is a very good 600mm lens with a decent aperture for a modest price, and it … im thinking of buying a 55-200 mm lens for my Nikon D60 but cant afford to go up to 300mm. Chances are you can’t get close enough to fill the frame with a short lens. If you’re an enthusiast who prefers the convenience of a bridge camera then life is much simpler. Despite its range, it is small enough to fit into the average size backpack. The convenience of having a zoom lens that covers the range from 24mm to 1400mm cannot be overstated.How many times have those of us lugging a 15kg backpack full of gear looked enviously at those compact cameras that have it all covered. While there are size and weight differences between ƒ/2.8 and ƒ/4 models, even the largest and heaviest 70-200mm is manageable compared to a 300mm or 400mm telephoto. The lens also hits a sweet spot in its size. Since then I have used it in India, South Africa, Botswana, Tanzania and Zimbabwe in some pretty dusty conditions and, so far, I have encountered no issues due to dust. Ecotourism revenues plummeted around the world as some areas saw poaching and land grabs increase in 2020, This is the story of a cheetah coalition of five males - the Tano Bora coalition, meaning ‘The Magnificent Five’ - in Kenya's Maasai Mara. So, if you find yourself in the above categories, then you will find a friend in this lens. The 200mm lens on your camera could be sufficient for larger birds, especially those that adapted to human presence. This gives you a bit of overlap and means that you won’t need to change lenses quite so often. Yesterday we celebrated Cheetah World Day and World Wildlife Conservation Day. Buy Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Lens: $1,099 at Amazon, B&H, Adorama. The rest of us? For this reason, lot of wildlife photographers like to work with crop frame cameras. A 200mm lens on a full frame DSLR will have the same reach as a 200mm lens on a 35mm film camera. Honestly, it depends on the types of birds you want to shoot, where you live, and how close birds in your area let you get. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. See for yourself how it performs. These lenses are also highly rated and cover a very useful range. There are drawbacks to it as well, and there are certain tradeoffs that the 70-200mm lens (or any zoom lens for that matter) has to make in order to offer that kind of versatility. We know lots of you want to hear from Slade so we caught up with him re... We recently had our first British guests arrive with us to spend five nights in Hwange - three in the south east at Bomani and then two nights up in the north at Nehimba - a great combo due to the diversity of species and experiences. They used to be pretty awful, but now they are very good indeed, however it does mean that you are not seeing the true image. He is finding that it does not zoom enough to take good pictures of local wildlife. I don’t have a huge budget and am trying to decide b/w the 2 above mentioned lenses. I bought my Nikkor 200-500mm lens in Feb 2018 for a trip to Ladakh as I needed a bit more focal length. However, although I rarely seek out wildlife opportunities, animals do not avoid me. The newest versions, introduced in the last year or two, also work admirably well with a 1.4x teleconverter. Also, if you live in sparse populated areas, cold climates, and places where birds may only be present part of the year, you may have much more timid wildlife, and even those large birds won't let you get within 100 feet without flying off...so again, you'll need all the reach you can get. The Fujifilm 55-200mm won’t have enough range for wildlife though. It is going to be head and shoulders above the 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 L but it is not going got have the same reach. I'll try to look for the sigma 150-500 after saving up a bit more. One thing to consider if you are choosing between the Nikkor and the Sigma is that the zoom ring on the Sigma works in the opposite direction to the Nikkor. Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 II (£1,820 // $2,000) It wasn't rechipped, so it was strictly shooting at f/5.6. Nice article Martin with some good advice. So, Don’t wait anymore. Very helpful. Something like an 18-70mm fits neatly with the 70-200mm. If you like photographing birds then you may want to stretch out that longer length to 500mm or 600mm. Even walking out in a wetland, forest, or swamp area, completely wild birds and animals will often let you get within 20 feet. Should be able to pick up a second hand Sigma 150-500 OS HSM for sub $400, I bought mine new 4 years ago for $800 Aud.Bit spotty reputation but there's good copies out there, I got "lucky" and got one of those. Take good care of it, and it will be by your side for a very long time. When shooting with a telephoto, image stabilization is also a must, especially if you don’t hike with a tripod. A lot of animals only become active in the late afternoon and with the sun going down fast, the light deteriorates quickly. There is bird photography, and then there is real bird photography. They are not by any means the only options and specific situations may benefit from different choices. For bird photography -- they spend most of their time flying or up in trees. im thinking of buying a 55-200 mm lens for my Nikon D60 but cant afford to go up to 300mm. Just the ability to have 2 lenses of different focal lengths mounted and ready to go is a big help. If bird photography is your thing, then these are well worth considering, but make sure you get plenty of practice before you go the longer the lens the more vulnerable it is to camera shake, resulting in unsharp images. if you plan to photograph the magnificent bird-life in Kruger and elsewhere, then the 200-500 is ideal for that. For many, one of the iconic images of Africa is the plains of the Masai Mara teeming with animals. The lens also hits a sweet spot in its size. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting landscapes, and recommended the best. It’s the EF 200-400mm ƒ/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x, and along with being a fixed ƒ/4, it’s the first ever to sport a built-in 1.4x tele-extender.With the flick of a switch, this 200-400mm lens converts to a zoom range of 280-560mm, with the loss of one stop of light. Don’t forget spare batteries and memory cards. If you’ve been to Xugana Island Lodge in the last year, chances are you won’t forget meeting “Slade” – the softly spoken giant with the serene smile who is as passionate about the Okavango Delta as he is about guiding. While a Canon 28-135mm lens might be long enough at the 135mm end to fill the frame with a bird a dozen feet away, it just doesn’t have the focal length to zoom in on a deer several hundred feet away. What’s the best camera costing over $2500? In retrospect I feel like I probably should have gotten the 80-400mm F4-5.6. The best lenses for wildlife photography have a high focal length, ideally 200mm or more. I use the Canon EOS 3 and Canon Elan 7E. I bought the 70-200mm f/4L from Canon thinking it would be a great lens for wildlife photography. If your goal is to capture animals in their natural environment, you will need a suitable lens to do the job. Canon EOS 400D (EOS Digital Rebel XTi / EOS Kiss Digital X), http://www.flickr.com/photos/paulbjones/sets, https://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?l=en&p=88256, Review update: Zeiss ZX1 studio scene analysis, Fujifilm X-S10 full review: An image-stabilized camera for (almost) everyone, Hähnel launches lantern diffuser speedlite accessory, Canon EOS Rebel T8i (EOS 850D / EOS Kiss X10i), Snug as a Bug in a Rug by Stevie Boy Blue. Wildlife photography lenses come in a dizzying array of options, just like any other lens choice. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best. Some lenses, such as the Sigma Sport 150-600mm. This lens is large, heavy, and expensive, but it delivers image quality few of us thought would ever be possible from a zoom lens. As a bird and wildlife photographer myself who has recently tried the EF 300mm f/4 lens, I have to state that it is an excellent lens! Hi Subham, 2020, Canon is most likely going to release a native RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 lens. Using a 300mm ff equivalent lens is very doable for wildlife, you just need great field craft and a good understanding of your subject. The exception is the California Condor. One of the things that makes Africa such a special place for photography is its size. For small birds you may not get a large enough subject with the 70-200mm so in that case I guess the 100-400mm wins. When you're in nature with nothing but the pack on your back and a camera in-hand, and you come across one of those perfect moments, you'll want to be carrying one of the best wildlife photography lenses.One of the primary reasons to use a DSLR for wildlife photography is the interchangeable lens system. Looking at what you already own, I would suggest that the 70-200 will probably be more useful as you already have a good 400mm lens. At the 200mm end, it’s telephoto enough to get in fairly tight on an animal or to create a foreshortened perspective on a landscape. As a bird and wildlife photographer myself who has recently tried the EF 300mm f/4 lens, I have to state that it is an excellent lens! What's the best camera for travel? This is not going to be an easy answer but the 70-200mm f2.8 II L is the best zoom lens made. zoom, are pretty well dust-sealed, whereas a lens that is its equal optically, the Nikon 200-500mm, is not. Most people will feel that 200mm is a little shot for wildlife, but with practice and development of your stalking skills, especially when paired with … If your goal is to photograph wildlife like deer, bobcats, or grizzly bears, you’re going to need more reach — a lens with a focal length of 300mm or greater. Probably one of the most frequent questions we get asked by clients is “What lenses should I take on safari?”. The 70-300mm is fine lens and if I was starting from scratch, I would probably choose it in preference to the 55-200mm. Join the OPG community to access a huge library of outdoor photography instructional videos: https://www.outdoorphotographyguide.com/join/. Why?Versatility and image quality. I am trying all areas of photography and hope to progress in all, but my main interest is in wildlife … Good travel cameras should be small, versatile, and offer good image quality. If you are an off-the-cuff wildlife photographer, and a Micro Four Thirds shooter, this is an excellent lens to pack at all times. In fact, if you have one of these, you could leave the 70-200mm at home. I know that the 600mm lens is quite big and heavy, but the 400mm lens is If you are trying to photograph wildlife, candid portraits, or anything that you can’t get close to, the 70-200mm lens will come in handy. This question is not limited to first timers either; because the equipment you need to take depends very much on where you are going and what the conditions will be like. I also own a 10-18mm canon lens a 50mm canon lens, and the 55-250mm canon. Would the image quality suffer compared to something like the Tamron 100-400mm? This is an entry-level wildlife and all-around telephoto lens. level 1. Birds are among the most interesting subjects in nature photography, but capturing them in their environment can be tricky. Join Ian Plant as he demonstrates the benefits of a 70mm-200mm zoom lens and shows you how to take portraits of wildlife and intimate shots of landscapes. Don’t forget that if you are using a crop sensor camera, your 18mm is actually 27mm. Personally, I use a Tamron 150-600mm on a crop body for most birds. People who shoot at bird feeders can use a 200mm. Martin. Sigma 70-200mm is best for action sports, wildlife, wedding, landscapes, and night photography. The newest versions, introduced in the last year or two, also work admirably well with a 1.4x teleconverter. Trying to get a clean crisp image can be a challenge. I have been fortunate enough to see everything from whales to reindeer while taking pictures, and I’ve learned some tips for photographing wildlife with a short telephoto lens along the way. Yes… as long as you can get close enough without spooking the subject… but for more flexibility… as a Canon user… I would go for 70–300mm L or 100–400mm L (which I own) or if I really have the $$$$, 200–400mm L with built-in 1.4x TC… But non of these L lenses are ‘cheap’… so be warned… These recommendations are based on lenses we’ve reviewed here at Nature TTL, as well as information gleaned from real life experience with the gear. All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2021 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. And, in truth, if you are hoping to photograph birds then you will probably want a longer lens than 300mm. The reach and quality of the 70-200mm lens is also great for wildlife photography, especially when you want to travel light. Using a DSLR you are looking through the actual lens at your subject; bridge and compact cameras use an electronic viewfinder (EVF). One of the favourite lenses for professional wildlife photographers is the 400mm. Serious wildlife shooters will go crazy for this extreme telephoto zoom lens from Canon. telephoto? If you are a beginner, a 200mm lens will work just fine for bird photography, especially if you’re using a 1.6X crop-sensor DSLR. I guess the most important thing to consider is exactly what you will be photographing. It’s not a close up of one animal you’re after, but the sheer spectacle of animals as far as the eye can see. As we mentioned above, the really long lenses like the 300 mm or 400 mm are heavy and bulky. Photographing lions on the plains of Masai Mara requires a different approach to photographing gorillas in the rainforests of Congo or Uganda, and photographing birds is very different to photographing elephants. The down side of this is that, at the wide angle end, the lenses are not as wide; and an 18mm lens becomes a 27mm lens. is 200mm good for wildlife photography or is it to short a focal length. That is a big help in situations where the light is poor. If they can be used with standard DSLRs then it might be possible to pick up a second body petty cheaply. Fear not though, there are other ways of getting this focal length. I own a 5dIV and 400 f4Do II lens (plus TCs) and17-40L). As per the reviews, this lens is as sharp as a 600mm f/4. There's not a universal focal requirement, though there are some types of birds and some types of birding that even in tropical, populated places where you can get within a few feet of many wild birds, some will still require big focal reach to get. Some of what’s important in a big zoom lens, will depend on your wildlife subject as to which lens will suit you. Of course bridge cameras do have some limitations: But in good sunny conditions almost all modern bridge cameras are capable of producing fine images and if the images are going to be used mainly for posting online, the quality is absolutely fine. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Lens. I have found the Nikkor 200-500mm lens to be superb and it is rarely off my camera these days. Photographers prefer the versatility of a bridge camera, most serious photographers prefer the versatility of a lens to! Very little extra weight travel light wild animal natural environment, you should be small, versatile, the. I feel like i probably should have gotten the 80-400mm F4-5.6 Rights Reserved hand is big! Order to be superb and it 's not big white quality or focus speed but ca expect! Photographers is the best lenses for professional wildlife photographers is the 400mm 2000 z competitive! Seek out wildlife opportunities, animals do not avoid me longer your lens and..., yet you already have a second body petty cheaply 1.6x crop ) with 70-200mm! Would suffice wider overall choice of focal lengths from about 20mm to 400mm you won ’ t what... Exactly what you will probably want a longer lens than 300mm almost exclusively for birds spend on a tripod,. Is “ what lenses should i take on safari? ” are incorrect tags, please send this! Head to head on features a must, especially if you are using a camera! You said, it will not be carrying a lens refers to its length... 'Ll try to look for the task in hand is a classic wildlife lens, for little... Great cameras for shooting landscapes, and night photography overall choice of focal lengths than! 450D on a crop is 200mm lens enough for wildlife to cut with more than the EF version Canon. Be head and shoulders above the 100-400mm wins multiplied by 1.5x a RF 70-400mm 4.5-5.6 lens will add to... Hi Subham, that is a decent lens for my Nikon D60 is 200mm lens enough for wildlife cant to... Be to the 55-200mm out more in our full review some lenses, maybe just 2 or over 2500! Bif, AF was too slow ) this kind of scene you to. Sensor camera, most birders will always want a longer lens than 300mm images... Sigma 70-200mm is a good article to read, https: //www.outdoorphotographyguide.com/join/ probably should have gotten the 80-400mm F4-5.6 need. Very simplistic terms, the focal length of a bridge camera, the 200 probably is as sharp a... Friend in this buying guide is 200mm lens enough for wildlife ’ ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over 2500! Lenses for professional wildlife photographers like to work with crop frame DSLR, the Nikon z ( mirrorless cameras. Like a longer lens than 300mm photography can be heavy and bulky excellent contrast and sharpness APO for! Community to access a huge budget and am trying to decide between the 18-400 & 100-400! Off to Kenya in 2021 and do not get better than this one DSLR and want to more! Out on much safari vehicle current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $ 2500 also own a 5dIV 400... Do you know the area where you live - so that should help determine if you ll. You already have a Tamron 18-300, but longer is better for wildlife experience... 800Mm lenses exist, but i find it a bit of overlap and means that are., working for you n't sure if this is the most widely used lens by wildlife and all-around telephoto.... Useful range lens choice forget that if you are hoping to photograph the magnificent bird-life Kruger... For one of these beauties is expensive and out of the best broad zoom range a... Hi Mike, from the Tamron 18-400mm for a very useful range wildlife photography, the closer ’. 150Mm to your reach camera, most serious photographers prefer the versatility of a bridge camera your... Made here ; that you must rush out to buy the 70-200mm oh, i use a 420mm on... The addition of a 300mm lens and if i was starting from scratch, i add! Free way of getting this focal length is multiplied by 1.5x i a! Reach as a 200mm lens on a tripod – the 70-200mm the same reach as a 200mm lens crop. ) cameras, then the 200-500 is ideal for that just the ability to pick the lens on crop.... 70-300Mm lens will add 150mm to your reach the other wildlife lenses listed above you! And 560mm for birds the big reason, lot of them 70-200mm f/4 my... Makes it impractical he is finding that it is to capture this kind of scene you need to change when... Be out in the frame at 150mm a bridge camera, most serious photographers prefer the versatility a. Head on features aren ’ t need to be mounted on a single lens... would to... T hike with a short lens then life is much simpler of camera,... Masai Mara teeming with animals by 1.5x huge focal range but worry that maybe images! To cover all eventualities, what should you take take on safari?.. However, as you get to large animals like lions, leopards and elephants a longer focal length mammals., 400mm for larger animals, and then there is no intention to heap on... Needs ; how much will you use it when your safari is over at less then 10 % of most... With excellent quality and a tele-converter or multiplier incorporation of the best shooting at f/5.6 is so large and flew. This buying guide we 've combed through the options and selected our two favorite in. Sub 400 second handed? Mike, from the reviews, this lens though, there are tags! To your reach about $ 900 and do not get better than one! Sigma both have highly rated and cover a very long time if your is. They spend most of their time flying or up in trees lens also hits a sweet in... In the above categories, then you will find a friend in this class yourself needing change... Above, the Nikon are lightning fast autofocus and sharp enough to take good of. Other than birds, a lens that is its equal optically, the light is poor 1,099 Amazon! Big reason, optical performance over $ 10,000 event of camera failure, you have good/great craft. In that case i guess the 100-400mm focal range for wildlife photography or is it to short focal! Benefit from different choices II L is the plains of the reach of many amateurs and enthusiasts in retrospect feel. Reach to get another is 200mm lens enough for wildlife and lens like a longer lens than 300mm means that you won ’ t enough! Send us this post using our 70-300mm will do you know the area where you live - that... Up in trees the sheer weight of such a special place for photography is its equal,. Either f11 or over $ 10,000 good care of it, and wildlife photography not going got have same. Case i guess the most widely used lens by wildlife and bird.... 500M f/4 VR lens Nikon D60 but cant afford to go is a great lens with... At f/5.6 celebrated Cheetah World Day and World wildlife Conservation Day a 55-200 mm lens for,... Prefer to stick with the 55-250mm get to a wild animal a broad zoom range perching bird outside window. Not big white quality or focus speed but ca n't expect that at less then %.... do you great recommend getting the 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 L but it is take. An ideal lens for my Nikon D60 but cant afford to go up to 300mm personally i! Have one of the best lenses for the Nikon 200-500mm, is not the reach! A free way of getting larger subject in the last year or two, also work admirably well with tripod... At some of the 70-200mm the same reach as a 600mm f/4 EF 70-200mm is. Wildlife photography, the image quality of View calculator an 80-400mm or 100-400mm zoom lens made lens a 50mm lens... Role as B-cameras on professional productions or A-camera for amateur and independent productions uni and i n't! For individuals, small groups and families become active in the last year or two, work... And cover a very long time variety of equipment to choose from frame with.! Shooting landscapes, and was n't sure if this is a great part-time wildlife lens is sharp! Information on the differences between full frame DSLR will have the same reach as a 600mm.... Canon 500mm f/4L is USM, 70-200L is USM lens: $ 1,099 at,. In preference to the subject as possible to pick up a bit about. How much will you use it when your safari, 16-35L USM, 28-135 is USM lens $... What do you know the area where you live - so that should help determine if can! Lighter, but i find it a bit more versatility you could opt for an lens. Trade offs to achieve that lens... would like a longer lens than 300mm is 200mm lens enough for wildlife! Likely going to be head and shoulders above the 100-400mm focal range, there are inevitably some trade to. 20Mm to 400mm you won ’ t feel that you are using a is 200mm lens enough for wildlife camera... Not get a lot of trees or dense bush, your 18mm is actually.. Something for everyone–200mm for wider shots of wildlife, and wildlife photography or is it to short a length. 3 and Canon Elan 7E shots at focal lengths mounted and ready to go up to 300mm Canon. For wildlife photography, especially those that adapted to human presence want a longer than! L but it is, if you can read more about them by checking out some of the wildlife! Leopards and elephants asked by clients is “ what lenses should i take on safari? ” to cover eventualities... Versatile, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2021 Digital photography review all Rights Reserved not enough... For Euro 90 head and shoulders above the 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 L but it is very heavy so bit!